<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mexico501</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mexico501.com/comments/feed//" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mexico501.com</link>
	<description>Our Experience Living in Mexico</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview: Why Mexico? by Lynn DeWeese-Parkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.mexico501.com/interview-why-mexico/73/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn DeWeese-Parkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mexico501.com/?p=73#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Re: “many components of Mexican society seem to be healthier than in the US.” 

Uncontroversial - the food. We eat much more fresh products and much less canned, frozen, prepared. We eat lower on the food chain, more beans, rice and corn, less meat. We eat more things grown closer, fewer things shipped from far away. We mostly buy in the open air street market and eat seasonally.

Somewhat controversial perhaps - walking down the street. First we do a lot more walking here, partly because of the weather but mostly I think because things are set up for walking and more people do more of it. Second, virtually everyone speaks to you on the street, at least a simple "buenos dias" or "buenos tardes." People seem much more courteous. It is hard to do anything without inquiries about one's family, etc.

Perhaps more controversial - respect seems more important. One shows it and receives it. A young woman I work with (volunteer on my part) asked if I preferred to be addressed as "tu" or "usted." Because I am 40 years older than she, she felt uncomfortable addressing me as "tu" without my permission. Even young "punks," "emos" and "darkos" here tend to be more polite than adults in the north.

Quite controversial probably - Mexico has a constitutional provision forbidding the stationing of foreign troops on its soil and forbidding the stationing of Mexican troops on foreign soil. It constitutionally forbids the sickness of invasion and imperialism.

I know that is 4 and not 2 things, but it is hard to stop at even 4 - I agree with the 2 above as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: “many components of Mexican society seem to be healthier than in the US.” </p>
<p>Uncontroversial - the food. We eat much more fresh products and much less canned, frozen, prepared. We eat lower on the food chain, more beans, rice and corn, less meat. We eat more things grown closer, fewer things shipped from far away. We mostly buy in the open air street market and eat seasonally.</p>
<p>Somewhat controversial perhaps - walking down the street. First we do a lot more walking here, partly because of the weather but mostly I think because things are set up for walking and more people do more of it. Second, virtually everyone speaks to you on the street, at least a simple &#8220;buenos dias&#8221; or &#8220;buenos tardes.&#8221; People seem much more courteous. It is hard to do anything without inquiries about one&#8217;s family, etc.</p>
<p>Perhaps more controversial - respect seems more important. One shows it and receives it. A young woman I work with (volunteer on my part) asked if I preferred to be addressed as &#8220;tu&#8221; or &#8220;usted.&#8221; Because I am 40 years older than she, she felt uncomfortable addressing me as &#8220;tu&#8221; without my permission. Even young &#8220;punks,&#8221; &#8220;emos&#8221; and &#8220;darkos&#8221; here tend to be more polite than adults in the north.</p>
<p>Quite controversial probably - Mexico has a constitutional provision forbidding the stationing of foreign troops on its soil and forbidding the stationing of Mexican troops on foreign soil. It constitutionally forbids the sickness of invasion and imperialism.</p>
<p>I know that is 4 and not 2 things, but it is hard to stop at even 4 - I agree with the 2 above as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview: Biggest Adjustment by mwshead</title>
		<link>http://www.mexico501.com/interview-biggest-adjustment/75/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>mwshead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mexico501.com/?p=75#comment-10</guid>
		<description>@Lynn - It may depend on where you are, but the police and military we encountered in Durango were nice and helpful.  Tijuana is right on the border so I'd expect there to be many more problems there.  

I don't think puling out the military in Mexico border towns would make them any safer.  It might temporarily reduce the number of people getting murdered by shifting the balance of power toward the mafia, but just letting them run things isn't really a sustainable solution.  

I think a lot of the problem is that Mexico doesn't seem to have the resources (or perhaps the will) to really do away with the mafia so neither side is going to really win.  In the US, a lot of the mafia wasn't brought down for their biggest crimes--it was tax evasion that did them in.  The corruption in Mexico isn't helping the problem either.

I'd be hesitant to draw conclusions about the country as a whole from the border towns.  Even in the US, the border towns can be pretty dangerous, but that doesn't really tell you anything about the US as a whole. It is like measuring the dangers of living in inner city LA to determine the danger of living in rural Nebraska.

Thanks for your thoughts.  It sounds like the Tijuana area is a lot more dangerous than I realized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lynn - It may depend on where you are, but the police and military we encountered in Durango were nice and helpful.  Tijuana is right on the border so I&#8217;d expect there to be many more problems there.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think puling out the military in Mexico border towns would make them any safer.  It might temporarily reduce the number of people getting murdered by shifting the balance of power toward the mafia, but just letting them run things isn&#8217;t really a sustainable solution.  </p>
<p>I think a lot of the problem is that Mexico doesn&#8217;t seem to have the resources (or perhaps the will) to really do away with the mafia so neither side is going to really win.  In the US, a lot of the mafia wasn&#8217;t brought down for their biggest crimes&#8211;it was tax evasion that did them in.  The corruption in Mexico isn&#8217;t helping the problem either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be hesitant to draw conclusions about the country as a whole from the border towns.  Even in the US, the border towns can be pretty dangerous, but that doesn&#8217;t really tell you anything about the US as a whole. It is like measuring the dangers of living in inner city LA to determine the danger of living in rural Nebraska.</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts.  It sounds like the Tijuana area is a lot more dangerous than I realized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview: Biggest Adjustment by Lynn DeWeese-Parkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.mexico501.com/interview-biggest-adjustment/75/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn DeWeese-Parkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mexico501.com/?p=75#comment-9</guid>
		<description>On military (and police) "protection:" Every shootout in Tijuana (where we have lived for 3.5 years now) has involved police or military on all sides. Nobody is safer, in my opinion, by increased police or militarization (in any country, but certainly not in Tijuana, Mexico). The U.S. is not safer because it is involved in two (or more) wars. Mexico is not safer with more weapons on the street. Crime rates have gone up with the increased militarization. Every time more soldiers arrive, more murders occur. 

This is especially frightening along the border where there has been a tremendous increase in military presence on both sides. Recently a young man (Mexican) was shot along the border with Arizona by a U.S. soldier who said he thought he was a goat. ???

Send the military back to their barracks on both sides!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On military (and police) &#8220;protection:&#8221; Every shootout in Tijuana (where we have lived for 3.5 years now) has involved police or military on all sides. Nobody is safer, in my opinion, by increased police or militarization (in any country, but certainly not in Tijuana, Mexico). The U.S. is not safer because it is involved in two (or more) wars. Mexico is not safer with more weapons on the street. Crime rates have gone up with the increased militarization. Every time more soldiers arrive, more murders occur. </p>
<p>This is especially frightening along the border where there has been a tremendous increase in military presence on both sides. Recently a young man (Mexican) was shot along the border with Arizona by a U.S. soldier who said he thought he was a goat. ???</p>
<p>Send the military back to their barracks on both sides!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview: Why Mexico? by mwshead</title>
		<link>http://www.mexico501.com/interview-why-mexico/73/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>mwshead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mexico501.com/?p=73#comment-8</guid>
		<description>@Michael - When we were there it was very common to see a father out with his kids--much more common than in the US.  There also seemed to be a greater involvement of grandparents in their children's lives.  People didn't seem to be a reliant on the government to take care of them as what I see in the US and it appeared that there were far fewer lawsuits than in the US--probably because you can't sue for "pain and suffering".

Mexico definitely has its downsides, but these were some of the areas that I noticed and thought "I wish the US was more like that!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael - When we were there it was very common to see a father out with his kids&#8211;much more common than in the US.  There also seemed to be a greater involvement of grandparents in their children&#8217;s lives.  People didn&#8217;t seem to be a reliant on the government to take care of them as what I see in the US and it appeared that there were far fewer lawsuits than in the US&#8211;probably because you can&#8217;t sue for &#8220;pain and suffering&#8221;.</p>
<p>Mexico definitely has its downsides, but these were some of the areas that I noticed and thought &#8220;I wish the US was more like that!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview: Why Mexico? by Juan</title>
		<link>http://www.mexico501.com/interview-why-mexico/73/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mexico501.com/?p=73#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I am glad your back! I was tire of reading the same stuff over and over again!!!... Welcome back and please update your blog more often! Its good reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad your back! I was tire of reading the same stuff over and over again!!!&#8230; Welcome back and please update your blog more often! Its good reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview: Why Mexico? by Michael Dickson</title>
		<link>http://www.mexico501.com/interview-why-mexico/73/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mexico501.com/?p=73#comment-5</guid>
		<description>You say, "many components of Mexican society seem to be healthier than in the US." Name one . . . or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say, &#8220;many components of Mexican society seem to be healthier than in the US.&#8221; Name one . . . or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview: Why Mexico? by Nancy Dardarian</title>
		<link>http://www.mexico501.com/interview-why-mexico/73/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Dardarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mexico501.com/?p=73#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Sorry I neglected to send an email back to you with our comments....you said you needed it for Wednesday and I thought LAST Wednesday!

Anyway, a very informative post, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I neglected to send an email back to you with our comments&#8230;.you said you needed it for Wednesday and I thought LAST Wednesday!</p>
<p>Anyway, a very informative post, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview: Why Mexico? by Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.mexico501.com/interview-why-mexico/73/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mexico501.com/?p=73#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I've been to Mexico twice but didn't spend enough time or travel extensively enough to know if I would like it or not. That's why I'm hoping USCIS will approve our petition.

If not, well, it looks like I could be a part of any future interviews. We take it one day at a time at the moment! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been to Mexico twice but didn&#8217;t spend enough time or travel extensively enough to know if I would like it or not. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m hoping USCIS will approve our petition.</p>
<p>If not, well, it looks like I could be a part of any future interviews. We take it one day at a time at the moment! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
